The Boar is an image that has continued to haunt me. My first encounter with the boar took place in "Adonis and Venus" Then on two versions of Ted Hughes Book The Goddess of Complete Being there is the image of the boar. Out of curiosity I read some of Ted Hughes work, specifically his poetry. Many of his more notable poems are focused on animals and the inherent emotions and imagery that each evokes. I especially enjoyed his poem, "Pike", among others.
Pike
Pike, three inches long, perfect
Pike in all parts, green tigering the gold.
Killers from the egg: the malevolent aged grin.
They dance on the surface among the flies.
Or move, stunned by their own grandeur,
Over a bed of emerald, silhouette
Of submarine delicacy and horror.
A hundred feet long in their world.
In ponds, under the heat-struck lily pads-
Gloom of their stillness:
Logged on last year's black leaves, watching upwards.
Or hung in an amber cavern of weeds
The jaws' hooked clamp and fangs
Not to be changed at this date:
A life subdued to its instrument;
The gills kneading quietly, and the pectorals.
Three we kept behind glass,
Jungled in weed: three inches, four,
And four and a half: red fry to them-
Suddenly there were two. Finally one
With a sag belly and the grin it was born with.
And indeed they spare nobody.
Two, six pounds each, over two feet long
High and dry and dead in the willow-herb-
One jammed past its gills down the other's gullet:
The outside eye stared: as a vice locks-
The same iron in this eye
Though its film shrank in death.
A pond I fished, fifty yards across,
Whose lilies and muscular tench
Had outlasted every visible stone
Of the monastery that planted them-
Stilled legendary depth:
It was as deep as England. It held
Pike too immense to stir, so immense and old
That past nightfall I dared not cast
But silently cast and fished
With the hair frozen on my head
For what might move, for what eye might move.
The still splashes on the dark pond,
Owls hushing the floating woods
Frail on my ear against the dream
Darkness beneath night's darkness had freed,
That rose slowly toward me, watching.
Ted Hughes
His poetry uses the image of these animals as a muses for his work. Thus the image of the Boar became more important to my understanding of Ted Hughes and his analysis of Shakespeare. I do not yet have Ted Hughes book, however it is on its way via UPS (those big brown trucks kind of look like boars). In the mean while I am looking into the boar outside of Hughes and Shakespeare, that way I may be able to pick up what Hughes and Shakespeare are putting down.
What I started to find intrigued me. I may be drawing these conclusions out of thin air, but I still find them interesting. The wild boar is a crepuscular animal; meaning they are active at night. When I read that it screamed school of night. Not only that but the wild boar is found on practically every continent (beside Greenland and Antarctica). Once introduced from one area to another they adapt and grow, like an idea. However it was not always like that. In the middle ages the boar was nearly hunted to extinction, pursued without mercy into the deepest recesses of world. The boar was no push over, when confronted the boar fights to the death. The boar reminds me of Sir Walter Raleigh in his last words to his executioner, "Strike man, Strike!"
Besides the biological, the boar has a symbolic meaning in many different mythologies. In Greek mythology both the Erymanthian Boar, and the Calydonian Boar were an instrument of the gods giving it a divine nature. Also these boars were both hunted by Greek heroes to prove their worth. The most interesting myth of the boar that I found, comes from Norse mythology. There was a boar by the name of Gullinbursti (meaning golden mane). This boar belonged to a nordic god by the name of Freyr. According to the myth Freyr threw a pigs skin into a furnace to create Gullinbursti which gave him bristles in his mane that glowed in the dark to light the way. Gullinbursti lights the way, he was a symbol of light in the dark, and enlightenment. Finally one last mythological boar Hildisvíni, on which a Nordic goddess Freya rode. The boar Hildisvini was actually her protege Ottar whom she had concealed as a boar to protect his identity.
At this time I don't quite know what to make of the boar and it's importance to Hughes but I am starting to draw some ideas. One the boar as a symbolic figure of enlightenment, and as a disguise. The disguise I want to say has something to do with the school of night, goddesses, gods, and maybe even Shakespeare himself.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Another First
Last semester I popped my blogging cherry with "The Bible as Literature" and this semester I have written my first sonnet. Believe it or not it took me days to write these fourteen lines. It was a doozy. I don't know if it is good or not so I offer it up to the blogging sphere of judgement.
Sonnet #1:
The plans of love cannot be made to wait,
As mice cannot begin to halt the owl.
Consigned to hang on by the thread of fate.
When cut, they fall wrung drops, like wounded fowl.
Into the mind the heart will seep and fill,
Each though consumed and urged to blend in time.
Two souls entwined like roots of plants with will,
To be but split shall kill them both in prime.
Perceived like wind on tops of golden reeds
To fan the flames that feed the needful thing,
By which the blur of life and things impede.
The sea will take those floundering.
A world with love endures great pain in loss
A force that sent a man to climb the cross.
Don't ask me what I think it means just let it mean whatever. I tried to have a theme in the sonnet but I don't know if it really came out in the end. Love is no doubt a beautiful thing but not with out consequence. Love wields tremendous power. This left me to ponder this question. If the world were loveless would it be a better place? I find that Shakespeare however romantic and flowering never once allows love to appear inconsequential. As I have come to find that love cause many in Shakespeare's work unbearable pain for some to the point of suicide, or murder. Obviously the love doesn't make them do these things but when the love is lost the ensuing flood of jealousy and grief certainly has some negative effects. So, again. Would the world be a better place with the absence of love?
P.S. beautiful blogs peeps. There is no favoritism in the world of Roberto's blog. Only in real life.
Sonnet #1:
The plans of love cannot be made to wait,
As mice cannot begin to halt the owl.
Consigned to hang on by the thread of fate.
When cut, they fall wrung drops, like wounded fowl.
Into the mind the heart will seep and fill,
Each though consumed and urged to blend in time.
Two souls entwined like roots of plants with will,
To be but split shall kill them both in prime.
Perceived like wind on tops of golden reeds
To fan the flames that feed the needful thing,
By which the blur of life and things impede.
The sea will take those floundering.
A world with love endures great pain in loss
A force that sent a man to climb the cross.
Don't ask me what I think it means just let it mean whatever. I tried to have a theme in the sonnet but I don't know if it really came out in the end. Love is no doubt a beautiful thing but not with out consequence. Love wields tremendous power. This left me to ponder this question. If the world were loveless would it be a better place? I find that Shakespeare however romantic and flowering never once allows love to appear inconsequential. As I have come to find that love cause many in Shakespeare's work unbearable pain for some to the point of suicide, or murder. Obviously the love doesn't make them do these things but when the love is lost the ensuing flood of jealousy and grief certainly has some negative effects. So, again. Would the world be a better place with the absence of love?
P.S. beautiful blogs peeps. There is no favoritism in the world of Roberto's blog. Only in real life.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Epic Poems
Shakespeare 's Poems "Adonis & Venus" and "The Rape of Lucrece" are no doubt epic in length and however I find "The Rape of Lucrece" also to be epic in the subject matter. The title kind of spoils it, but it doesn't prepare you for what is about to come. What is so disturbing is the blend of Shakespeare's language and the rapist Tarquinius's thoughts. The thoughts of Tarquinius are no doubt dark and vile. Giving you a creepy all over feeling. You become privy to thoughts that are unnerving, his motive, his desire, his plan. All the while innocent and chaste Lucrece sleeps comfortably in her bed. Now forgive me if I offend, but despite the prospect of rape, the scene leading up to the act is some what erotic. As text it is surely erotic, however I never thought that I would become some what 'aroused' by the voyeurism of the sleeping Lucrece and Shakespeare's detailed descriptions e.g. The blue veined alabaster breasts. Again these feeling are just my own, and are just evidence of the power of words to produce a emotive as well as physiological response in the reader.
Similarly I also felt stirred in certain ways when it came to the poem of "Adonis and Venus" Shakespeare has a way with words. His description of lust for instance has tremendous beauty metaphorically and a very carnal and tactile nature. You can get hot under the collar just reading. Again this may be and probably is isolated to my own experience. Regardless this is great stuff. I have always been stuck reading the same old same old of Shakespeare since middle school so it is refreshing to read pieces that I have not had the pleasure of reading before.
Shakespeare speaks in a whole other language, and by this I am not referring to the vernacular of the period but the way in which Shakespeare describes and relates things. The man has a style that seems all his own. He writes in metaphors and simile, he personifies, hyperbolizes. It is funny because in oral traditions with Dr. Morgan we looked at a the beginning of Shakespeare's Sonnet 73:
That time of year thou mayst in me behold
When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang
Upon those boughs which shake against the cold,
Bare ruin'd choirs, where late the sweet birds sang.
And what is so wonderful is that Shakespeare is writing "I am old." Yet his way of putting it is so much more enthralling to read. I used this example because it is fresh in my mind, but I have no doubts that there are many others that come to mind.
Similarly I also felt stirred in certain ways when it came to the poem of "Adonis and Venus" Shakespeare has a way with words. His description of lust for instance has tremendous beauty metaphorically and a very carnal and tactile nature. You can get hot under the collar just reading. Again this may be and probably is isolated to my own experience. Regardless this is great stuff. I have always been stuck reading the same old same old of Shakespeare since middle school so it is refreshing to read pieces that I have not had the pleasure of reading before.
Shakespeare speaks in a whole other language, and by this I am not referring to the vernacular of the period but the way in which Shakespeare describes and relates things. The man has a style that seems all his own. He writes in metaphors and simile, he personifies, hyperbolizes. It is funny because in oral traditions with Dr. Morgan we looked at a the beginning of Shakespeare's Sonnet 73:
That time of year thou mayst in me behold
When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang
Upon those boughs which shake against the cold,
Bare ruin'd choirs, where late the sweet birds sang.
And what is so wonderful is that Shakespeare is writing "I am old." Yet his way of putting it is so much more enthralling to read. I used this example because it is fresh in my mind, but I have no doubts that there are many others that come to mind.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
The School of Night: bad asses with mustaches
Step One: Become Sir Walter Raleigh
"The weightless thoughts of man can effectively control the massive universe itself, if correct principles of rational transformation–proper levers, pulleys, lenses, clocks, quadrants–can be found. The microcosm can not only reflect, but control, the macrocosm."
- Mustache/Sparse facial hair ☑
- One golden earring ☑
- Member of secret society ☑
- Black attire ☑ or as often as I can.
- English I will see what I can do.
- Beheaded ?
"Archimedes had claimed to be able to move the world if he were given a fixed place for a fulcrum. The emblem and motto develop Archimedes’ idea in a way peculiar to the School of Night. Does the emblem mean that the world is equal to nothing? Or that it is supported by nothing? Or that so great is human thought that though it have but a feather’s weight in the physical realm, yet by the contrivance of a machine it can move the world? From what bird came the feather? The mind or imagination of man was likened to a bird in a metaphor standard to the great Renaissance humanists. The fulcrum is a sort of equals-sign; the length of the beam on either side can be compared to a numerical multiplier; the weights are the multiplicands. What does the equation mean?""The weightless thoughts of man can effectively control the massive universe itself, if correct principles of rational transformation–proper levers, pulleys, lenses, clocks, quadrants–can be found. The microcosm can not only reflect, but control, the macrocosm."
However out there, Fredrick Turner's piece was quite interesting. I picked the above quotations because I felt like they embodied the essence of what Turner was getting at. The power of the mind the the seemingly endless possibilities for thought. Now at this juncture I find it premature to draw any conclusions, but his essay has given me plenty to think about and I plan on using the above quotes as theoretical thread upon which to weave my thoughts.
As an aside I am beginning to realize that when it comes to William Shakespeare everything is not as it seems. Shakespeare is no doubt an iconic figure and generally regarded as being one of if not the greatest literary mind to have ever walked the face of our pale blue dot. However the more I research the icon the more I found to be missing. Just this week on PBS there was a program called "The Battle of Wills" which was all about the portraits of Shakespeare and how most of the portraits of him were painted posthumously. Leaving only a couple of portraits that could have been painted while he was alive. Which to me was preposterous that here we have the vision of a such an iconic figure and it may not even be him. It blew my mind. It is as if Shakespeare in the last four hundred years has become a mythic figure in and of himself like much like the characters he created. Shakespeare in my mind has become so mythic that at this point it wouldn't even matter if he had ever existed, because regardless of who he was as a man the body of work lives on. This is crazy talk, but I am just waiting to find out that William Shakespeare was some sort imaginary identity created by The School of Night as an outlet for them to publish their creative works. If that were true then they would have changed the world in greater ways than anyone could have imagined. I say that because the majority of the members of the school of night were geniuses in their own right.
The point being that you think you know something, but when you dig a little deeper you start to find that you know nothing at all. The patterns and connections with the Shakespearean texts may drive me insane.
The point being that you think you know something, but when you dig a little deeper you start to find that you know nothing at all. The patterns and connections with the Shakespearean texts may drive me insane.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)